Should You Consider Gummy Bear Implants Over Traditional Saline Implants?
When it comes to breast augmentation, the landscape of choices has evolved beyond traditional saline and silicone implants. The spotlight is now on cohesive gel implants, affectionately dubbed "gummy bear" implants, as a groundbreaking alternative with a host of advantages.
Exploring Gummy Bear Implants: A Natural Marvel
Often referred to as "gummy bears" due to their unique properties, these implants are formally known as cohesive silicone gel implants or form-stable breast implants. The nickname originated from a groundbreaking discovery: when cut in half, the implant retained its original shape, akin to a gummy bear. In its intact form, the implant mirrors a teardrop, offering a more natural appearance.
Gummy bear implants comprise an outer silicone shell and an inner gel silicone filling, providing the perfect blend of form and function. Their versatility allows for placement over or under breast tissue and muscle, with each option carrying its own set of considerations. While over-the-muscle placement is less invasive, under-the-muscle placement often results in a more natural look, albeit with a potential impact on breastfeeding.
The Pros and Cons of Gummy Bear Implants
Feel the Realness: One standout advantage is the authentic look and feel of gummy bear implants. Their cross-linked gel filling allows them to maintain a soft, teardrop shape, offering a more natural appearance.
Shape Integrity: Unlike some implants that may change shape with movement, gummy bear implants remain consistent. Their fuller bottom and narrower top contribute to a stable form, minimizing the risk of unwanted changes.
Texture Matters: While textured implants were once popular for better tissue adherence, concerns over breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) have led to many textured options being phased out. Gummy bear implants, however, remain a safe choice.
Longevity Assurance: With a lifespan of around 20 years, gummy bear implants hold their own against silicone and saline alternatives. FDA-approved and introduced in the mid-2000s, they offer durability with a lower risk of rupture and leakage.
Safety First: Considered safe by the FDA, gummy bear implants pose minimal leakage risk even in the rare event of a rupture. Regular screenings can help address potential concerns, although all breast implants carry a small risk of complications.
Scar Considerations: A potential drawback lies in slightly larger incisions compared to saline or soft silicone implants. The form-stable nature of gummy bears necessitates a longer incision, but strategic placement can minimize visible scarring.
Choosing Between Saline, Silicone, and Gummy Bear Implants
If you're navigating the decision-making process for breast augmentation, understanding the nuances of implant types is crucial. Silicone implants, including gummy bears, offer a more natural look and feel compared to saline alternatives. Saline implants are more compressible, resulting in smaller scars, but may lack the subtlety of their silicone counterparts.
Gummy bear implants stand out with their tapered shape, providing a gentle slope and enhanced fullness at the lower part of the breast. Their strength ensures shape retention, even with a thicker filling.
Ultimately, the choice between saline, silicone, or gummy bear implants hinges on personal preferences, desired outcomes, and discussions with your surgeon.
Dr. Chow is one of Austin's leading plastic surgeons and breast specialists. He and his team specialize in creating tailormade experiences to fit your aesthetic goals and aspirations. Call us at (512) 666-8376 to schedule your complimentary consultation or send us a message here for more information.
Comentários